Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelikli, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-24T08:17:37Z
dc.date.available2019-06-24T08:17:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11772/1501
dc.description.abstractThis essay examines how Aristotle creates propositions. It evaluates his use of quality and quantity in his theory of syllogism. In De Interpretatione, Aristotle used the term, ‘apophansis’, but he preferred ‘protasis’ in Analytica Priora. While Aristotle classified these as affirmative and negative due to their qualities, he embraced a different point of view about classifications based on quantity. Differences in apophansis are evaluated on the basis of their singular and universal structures, and their predications are also taken into consideration. As he studied protasis, however, he re-arranged the classifications of apophansis and re-shaped them according to their predicative properties. The structural difference between De Interpretatione and Analytica Priora are revealed through a careful examination of Aristotle’s use of these two concepts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBeytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPropositionen_US
dc.subjectProtasisen_US
dc.subjectApophansisen_US
dc.subjectAristotelian logicen_US
dc.subjectFelsefeen_US
dc.subjectAristoteles mantığıen_US
dc.titleProtasis and Apophansis in Aristotle’s logicen_US
dc.title.alternativeAristoteles mantığında Protasis ve Apophansisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalBeytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophyen_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage17en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record