Determination of the Efficiencies of Textile Firms Listed in Borsa Istanbul by Using DEA-Window Analysis

dc.contributor.authorApan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAlp, Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorÖztel, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorÖztel, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T10:04:41Z
dc.date.created2019
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentFakülteler, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü
dc.description.abstractGlobal competition enables countries' advantageous sectors to stand out as an indicator of their economic power. The importance of these sectors may vary by country or the time period they operate in. The textile industry is one of the sectors that significantly contributes to Turkey's economic growth. Thus, it is important to monitor the financial activities of the firms in the textile sector as a performance indicator since it is evident that the financial efficiency of each company will contribute positively to the overall efficiency of the whole sector. In this study, the financial activities of 19 firms in the textile sector being traded on Borsa Istanbul (BIST) for the period 2008-2017 are examined. For efficiency analysis, DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis)-Window Analysis method was applied by using financial indicators of these companies. It was observed that the highest average efficiency value of the companies was realized in 2017 with 94.09%. The average activity levels in other years were found to be in the range of 60%-90%. In the empirical analysis, the efficiency values of the top five companies were determined to be at the level of 90%-100%. DESA has achieved the most successful performance in average efficiencies with a score of 98.04 when the whole period is considered. SONMEZ and MENDERES firms have taken the second and the third places with scores of 97.40 and 94.74, respectively. The close performances of the top three firms were also observed in three-years windows. However, in the three-year window analysis, SONMEZ ranked the first, DESA ranked the second and MENDERES ranked the third according to their average scores. One of the reasons for this small difference between the rankings is that, firstly, the firms' performances have been very close to each other, and secondly the effect of the low score (76.11) obtained by SONMEZ in 2008 has been diminished for the firm in the three-year window analysis. KARSU occupied the last place with the lowest average efficiency score in both rankings.
dc.identifier.doi10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2019.04.06
dc.identifier.endpage128
dc.identifier.issn1305-5577
dc.identifier.issue42
dc.identifier.orcidOZTEL, AHMET/0000-0002-9627-7850
dc.identifier.startpage107
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2019.04.06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/20860
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000512302900006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSosyoekonomi Soc
dc.relation.ispartofSosyoekonomi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectEfficiency
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectTextile
dc.subjectDea
dc.subjectWindow Analysis
dc.titleDetermination of the Efficiencies of Textile Firms Listed in Borsa Istanbul by Using DEA-Window Analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfc1000ab-1376-4448-a3fd-7aff30cf7d6f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfc1000ab-1376-4448-a3fd-7aff30cf7d6f

Dosyalar