Evaluation of the different exposure parameters for the accurate diagnosis of peri-implantitis severity in digital panoramic radiography

dc.contributor.authorSadik, Elif
dc.contributor.authorGokmenoglu, Ceren
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Gokcen
dc.contributor.authorKara, Cankat
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T10:02:00Z
dc.date.created2023
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentBartın Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground: To evaluate the accuracy of the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects' severities in digital pan-oramic radiographs obtained at different tube voltage and/or tube current settings. Material and Methods: Two different sizes of peri-implant bone defects (type 1 and type 2) were prepared after the implants were inserted into 29 bovine rib blocks. Digital panoramic radiographs were obtained at eight different tube voltage and/or tube current settings for all rib blocks. Implant images were cropped separately. The average intensity value (AIV) of cropped images were analyzed using Adobe Photoshop CC software. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare AIVs. All cropped images were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale for the likeli-hood of a bone defect being absent or present. The weighted kappa values were calculated to compare observer agreement and ROC analysis was performed to determine the appropriate exposure parameters. Results: The lowest AIV was obtained at 72 kV/6.3 mA (92.162 +/- 16.016), and the highest AIV was obtained at 60 kV/3.2 mA (179.050 +/- 13.823). The Kruskal-Wallis H test showed significant differences in the AIVs according to the exposure parameters (p<0.001). The kappa coefficient for the inter-observer agreement was excellent (0.864, p<0.001). The AUC values for type 1 defects ranged from 0.778 and 0.860; for type 2 defects ranged from 0.920 and 0.967. The AUC value of type 1 defects was slightly better in panoramic images obtained with high kV and low mA levels (72 kV/3.2 mA), compared to others. Conclusions: In daily clinical routine, peri-implant bone defects might be evaluated by panoramic radiographs obtained with all kV and mA values tested. However, to avoid misdiagnosing and for better accuracy, panoramic radiographs obtained with high kV and low mA levels suitable for patients should be used, especially in the detec-tion of small or initial bone defects.
dc.description.sponsorshipOrdu University Scientific Research Committee [AP-1722]
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding This study was supported by Ordu University Scientific Research Committee (AP-1722) .
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/medoral.25501
dc.identifier.endpageE24
dc.identifier.issn1698-6946
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid36565217
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145242039
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpageE16
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25501
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/20374
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000921613200003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMedicina Oral S L
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectDental Implant
dc.subjectPanoramic Radiography
dc.subjectPeri-Implantitis
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.titleEvaluation of the different exposure parameters for the accurate diagnosis of peri-implantitis severity in digital panoramic radiography
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar