Assembly area risk assessment methodology for post-flood evacuation by integrated neutrosophic AHP-CODAS

dc.contributor.authorSahmutoglu, Irem
dc.contributor.authorTaskin, Alev
dc.contributor.authorAyyildiz, Ertugrul
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T13:24:30Z
dc.date.created2022
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentBartın Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractFloods are one of the natural disasters that affect human life materially and morally. There are various measures to prevent flood damage. The evaluation of flood risk and assembly points is of great importance for flood risk preparation and disaster mitigation measures. This study presents a two-stage framework with a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique for flood and assembly point risk assessment problems. First of all, with a detailed literature review, the main and sub-criteria affecting the flood and assembly points are determined. Each criterion is evaluated with expert opinion. Then, the importance weights of the criteria are determined with the Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Analytical Hierarchy Process (IVN-AHP) methodology. The ranking of the twelve assembly points in Bartin according to their risks is obtained by the Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Combinative Distance-based Assessment (IVN-CODAS) method. The proposed risk assessment methodology is applied to the Merkez district of Bartin, Turkey, which is frequently exposed to floods. In this context, a risk assignment hierarchy consisting of 6 main criteria as Topographic, Access, Hydrological, Sociological, Humanitarian Aid and Infrastructure and a total of 24 sub-criteria is constructed. The most important main criterion is determined as Topographic. Although 'Topographic' is the most important main criterion, considering that there is no significant difference between this criterion and the others, it is suggested that each criterion should be considered when determining the location of an assembly point. The results demonstrate that the most important sub-criterion is Proximity to flood risk area with a final weight of 0.076 among 24 criteria. The result of the proposed methodology is tested by sensitivity analysis. A comparative analysis is also done to verify the efficiency of the proposed methodology. The proposed integrated methodology is intended to be a useful tool for disaster risk assessments and to guide decision makers.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11069-022-05712-1
dc.identifier.endpage1103
dc.identifier.issn0921-030X
dc.identifier.issn1573-0840
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.orcidAYYILDIZ, ERTUGRUL/0000-0002-6358-7860
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150688892
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1071
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05712-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/22976
dc.identifier.volume116
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000885869600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofNatural Hazards
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-11: Sustainable Cities And Communities
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectAssembly Point
dc.subjectFlood Risk
dc.subjectInterval-Valued Neutrosophic Numbers
dc.subjectAhp
dc.subjectCodas
dc.titleAssembly area risk assessment methodology for post-flood evacuation by integrated neutrosophic AHP-CODAS
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar