How Effective are Writing Interventions on Writing Outcomes, Qualities, and Attitudes? A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis for Postgraduate Theses in Türkiye

dc.contributor.authorKansızoğlu, Hasan Basri
dc.contributor.authorKansızoğlu, Nurbanu
dc.contributor.authorMemiş, Muhammet
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-22T11:42:06Z
dc.date.created2026
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentBartın Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis meta-analysis examined 137 thesis studies on writing interventions in Turkish schools. After removing outliers, overall effect sizes were calculated from 129 studies (627 test results) for writing outcomes, 103 studies for quality, and 32 studies for attitude. Robust variance estimation was used to address dependency in studies reporting multiple effect sizes. Results showed large effects on writing outcomes (g = 1.17) and quality (g = 1.43), with moderate effects on attitudes toward writing (g = 0.59). Among interventions, Self-Regulated Strategy Development, graphic organizers, pre-writing strategies, process approach, strategy teaching, text-based teaching, and various text structure instructions had larger effects. Meta-regression models revealed genre instruction studies had larger effects on quality, while studies with two different teacher implementers showed larger effects on attitude. Grade level+genre-based and pilot study+genre-based+grade level models explained 16% of variance in writing quality. These findings provide an evidence-based framework for effective writing instruction.
dc.description.abstractThis meta-analysis examined 137 thesis studies on writing interventions in Turkish schools. After removing outliers, overall effect sizes were calculated from 129 studies (627 test results) for writing outcomes, 103 studies for quality, and 32 studies for attitude. Robust variance estimation was used to address dependency in studies reporting multiple effect sizes. Results showed large effects on writing outcomes (g = 1.17) and quality (g = 1.43), with moderate effects on attitudes toward writing (g = 0.59). Among interventions, Self-Regulated Strategy Development, graphic organizers, pre-writing strategies, process approach, strategy teaching, text-based teaching, and various text structure instructions had larger effects. Meta-regression models revealed genre instruction studies had larger effects on quality, while studies with two different teacher implementers showed larger effects on attitude. Grade level+genre-based and pilot study+genre-based+grade level models explained 16% of variance in writing quality. These findings provide an evidence-based framework for effective writing instruction.
dc.identifier.doi10.18009/jcer.1701299
dc.identifier.issn2148-2896
dc.identifier.startpage0
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1701299
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/26683
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTamer KUTLUCA
dc.publisherTamer KUTLUCA
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Computer and Education Research
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Computer and Education Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_DergiPark_20260218
dc.subjectTurkish Education
dc.subjectTürkçe Eğitimi
dc.titleHow Effective are Writing Interventions on Writing Outcomes, Qualities, and Attitudes? A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis for Postgraduate Theses in Türkiye
dc.title.alternativeHow Effective are Writing Interventions on Writing Outcomes, Qualities, and Attitudes? A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis for Postgraduate Theses in Türkiye
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar