Deep-learning-based interferometric synthetic aperture radar time-series analysis for the monitoring and prediction of dam safety

dc.contributor.authorAbdikan, Saygin
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Suat
dc.contributor.authorNarin, Omer Gokberk
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Eren Gürsoy
dc.contributor.authorBayik, Caglar
dc.contributor.authorSanli, Fusun Balik
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Eren Gürsoy
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T10:05:13Z
dc.date.created2025
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentBartın Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractContinuous monitoring of large structures is crucial to ensure their optimal functionality. This paper presents a comprehensive study on dam monitoring using the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) technique and prediction time series based on InSAR data. Two types of dams were the focus of the study: rock-fill Atat & uuml;rk Dam, the largest dam in T & uuml;rkiye, located in the eastern part of the country, and earth-fill B & uuml;y & uuml;k & ccedil;ekmece Dam in Istanbul. In our analysis, we applied the compressed InSAR approach, which provides a higher density of persistent scatter for InSAR analysis. Unlike other studies on dam monitoring using InSAR methods, we aimed to predict displacement using time series derived from both ascending and descending InSAR results, yet this aspect has received little attention. For this purpose, we employed the long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network deep learning method. Moreover, we conducted experiments in both dams with different training and testing ratios acquired in both ascending and descending orbits to evaluate the importance of sampling number. The maximum displacements observed were -15 mm/year for B & uuml;y & uuml;k & ccedil;ekmece Dam and -7 mm/year for Atat & uuml;rk Dam. For Atat & uuml;rk Dam, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) is consistently less than 0.9 mm, with percent root-mean-square error (%RMSE) ranging between 6.9% and 26%. In the case of B & uuml;y & uuml;k & ccedil;ekmece Dam, we observed an RMSE of less than 1.3 mm, with %RMSE values ranging between 9.3% and 36.5% for different training and testing scenarios. Our LSTM results demonstrated that as the training percentage increased, the %RMSE values generally lose as well. This indicates a considerably higher relative error when less training data are used, highlighting the importance of data quantity in the predictive accuracy of our model. The results demonstrated that the LSTM estimation method can be effectively applied to health monitoring of large structures, such as dams.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/14759217251381157
dc.identifier.issn1475-9217
dc.identifier.issn1741-3168
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1829-9624
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105023289616
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/14759217251381157
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/21124
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001588963600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofStructural Health Monitoring-An International Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.relation.sdgGoal-07: Affordable and Clean Energy
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectDam Monitoring
dc.subjectInterferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Time Series
dc.subjectSentinel-1
dc.subjectDeep Learning
dc.subjectLong Short-Term Memory
dc.titleDeep-learning-based interferometric synthetic aperture radar time-series analysis for the monitoring and prediction of dam safety
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication16a4e822-f9e9-43d7-918e-16288ab241d4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery16a4e822-f9e9-43d7-918e-16288ab241d4

Dosyalar