Balancing Conservation and Development Through Explainable Machine Learning and NSGA-II: A Case Study of Osmaniye

dc.contributor.authorAdiguzel, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz, Enes
dc.contributor.authorEmir, Tuna
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorÖzel, Halil Barış
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-21T16:21:55Z
dc.date.created2026
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentBartın Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractLand-use planning in ecologically sensitive landscapes requires balancing biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service provision, agricultural production, settlement expansion, and infrastructure demand within a single spatial system. This challenge is particularly significant in Mediterranean environments, where long-term land transformations and increasing development pressures intensify conflicts among competing land-use priorities. Accordingly, the present study develops an integrated spatial zoning and decision-support framework for Osmaniye Province, southern T & uuml;rkiye. The framework integrates fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation, CatBoost-based machine learning, SHAP-based interpretability, and NSGA-II multi-objective optimization. The workflow followed a sequential decision process in which an expert-derived zoning surface was first established through fuzzy evaluation, reconstructed from continuous spatial predictors using CatBoost, interpreted through SHAP, and refined through NSGA-II under explicit spatial constraints. By using the expert-derived zoning surface as the learning target, the CatBoost stage aimed to evaluate the internal consistency and spatial learnability of the planning logic within a present-day zoning context. The results indicated that the integrated framework distinguished conservation, controlled-use, and development priorities while identifying the key environmental and anthropogenic drivers shaping class-specific zoning outcomes. The final zoning structure allocated 37.9% of the study area to conservation, 43.6% to controlled use, and 18.5% to development. The study shows that by including a transitional zone with varying proportions of conservation, controlled use, and development, a more balanced distribution among the three goals can be achieved compared to a fixed partition into these three zones. The findings further demonstrate that this approach is more effective than current zoning, which does not accommodate such trade-offs.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/land15050881
dc.identifier.issn2073-445X
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105040268081
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.3390/land15050881
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/27553
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001775597600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofLand
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260621
dc.subjectLand-Use Zoning
dc.subjectFuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation
dc.subjectCatboost
dc.subjectShap
dc.subjectMulti-Objective Optimization
dc.titleBalancing Conservation and Development Through Explainable Machine Learning and NSGA-II: A Case Study of Osmaniye
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar