Examination of the learning approaches used by prospective teachers

dc.contributor.authorDuman, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorŞahan, Gülsün
dc.contributor.authorŞahan, Gülsün
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Burcu
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T08:25:34Z
dc.date.available2020-02-04T08:25:34Z
dc.date.created2017
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.issuedyyyymmdd2017-01
dc.departmentFakülteler, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study is to determine the learning approaches used by prospective teachers and to examine whether they differ in terms of several variables or not. To this end, answers for the following questions are sought: 1. To what extent do prospective teachers use deep and surface learning approaches? 2. Do the learning approaches used by prospective teachers differ in terms of gender, age and department variables? Quantitative research method was employed in the study. The population of the study, carried out in survey design, consisted of prospective teachers attending a teacher training certificate programme at a university in Turkey in 2014-2015 academic year. The sampling of the study was 344 teacher candidates in the departments of “Turkish Language and Literature”, “History”, Philosophy”, “Geography” and “Religious Culture”. “Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F)” adapted to Turkish by Önder and Beşoluk (2010) was used as the means of data collection. The questionnaire consists of 20 five point likert items and two subcategories. The data were analysed in SPSS 22,0 statistics package programme. Percentage, frequency, mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test and one-way Anova were used to analyse the data. According to the results of the study, prospective teachers use deep learning approaches more than surface learning approaches. Although prospective teachers’ use of deep learning approaches don’t differ with respect to gender, their use of surface learning approaches differ in favour of male prospective teachers. It was also found out in the study that age variable doesn’t have an influence on the learning approaches of prospective teachers. Surface learning approaches differ in terms of department variable.
dc.identifier.endpage5
dc.identifier.orcid60560
dc.identifier.startpage5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/2486
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAGP Humanities And Social Sciences Conference
dc.relation.ispartofAGP Humanities And Social Sciences Conference
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectProspective teacher
dc.subjectDeep learning
dc.subjectSurface learning
dc.subjectLearning approach
dc.titleExamination of the learning approaches used by prospective teachers
dc.typeConference Object
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication75ac8c78-00e0-4f08-9338-af8c824924a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication86436bca-79f6-406d-8687-588405eeb32a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery75ac8c78-00e0-4f08-9338-af8c824924a0

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
2017 AGP birleştirilmiş özet metin.pdf
Boyut:
3.48 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: