The Comparative Study of Different Mixing Methods for Microcrystalline Cellulose/Polyethylene Composites

dc.contributor.authorBoran, S.
dc.contributor.authorKiziltas, A.
dc.contributor.authorKiziltas, E. E.
dc.contributor.authorGardner, D. J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T13:24:38Z
dc.date.created2016
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentBartın Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPolymer composites with polyethylene (PE), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), and coupling agent (PE-g-MA) were melt blended using a single screw extruder (SSE), twin screw extruder (TSE), and a combination of SSE and extensional flow mixer (EFM) and masterbatch method (MB). The rheological behavior, mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties were investigated to compare material behavior of the MCC-filled PE composites and to evaluate the dispersive mixing efficiency. The composite samples prepared using a single pass method in SSE had relatively larger storage moduli (G') while those from the TSE and SSE + EFM were smaller. The complex viscosities (eta*) of composites with processed using EFM was higher than that of neat PE, indicating better dispersion of the MCC. MCC-filled PE composites processed with EFM showed higher tan delta compared to those of composites. In general, MCC-filled PE composites from the EFM process showed higher viscosity compared to all other composites at all shear rates. The EFM method improved flexural properties more than the other processing methods. The effect of EFM on impact strength of the composites was improved with coupling agent. Addition of MCC, couple agent, and different mixing methods did not significantly affect the thermal properties of the MCC-filled PE composites.
dc.description.sponsorshipCouncil of Higher Education (YOK); Karadeniz Technical University
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Council of Higher Education (YOK) and Karadeniz Technical University have been acknowledged for the scholarship of the postdoctoral researcher Sevda Boran to do this study at the University of Maine. The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Alex Nash and Chris West whose hard work made this paper possible.
dc.identifier.doi10.3139/217.3156
dc.identifier.endpage103
dc.identifier.issn0930-777X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84964786458
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage92
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3139/217.3156
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/23029
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000372022300010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCarl Hanser Verlag
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Polymer Processing
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectPolypropylene-Clay Nanocomposites
dc.subjectDensity Polyethylene Composites
dc.subjectExtensional Flow Mixer
dc.subjectMechanical-Properties
dc.subjectAcid Pla
dc.subjectCellulose
dc.subjectBehavior
dc.subjectPolyolefins
dc.subjectDispersion
dc.subjectParticles
dc.titleThe Comparative Study of Different Mixing Methods for Microcrystalline Cellulose/Polyethylene Composites
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar