EVALUATION OF TEACHING STAFF TO INCREASE THE QUALITY OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION THROUGH MANY FACET RASCH MEASUREMENT MODEL

dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorÜnal, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorGençel, Osman
dc.contributor.authorSemerci, Nuriye
dc.contributor.authorSemerci, Çetin
dc.contributor.authorSemerci, Çetin
dc.contributor.authorSemerci, Nuriye
dc.contributor.authorGençel, Osman
dc.contributor.authorÜnal, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Emrullah
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T13:24:18Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentFakülteler, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.departmentFakülteler, Eğitim Fakültesi, Türkçe ve Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Bölümü
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we have analyzed the performance of teaching staff in a college of engineering of a university. Our analysis is based on a survey of students and involves the many-facet Rasch model. The study group consisted of a sum of 683 students enrolled at the depai tuient of civil engineering at a university in Turkey in 2017-2018 academic year. The department of civil engineering included 62 courses. 25 of these courses were used for evaluating the general performance of teaching staff and 6 of them were used in the evaluation carried out through Rasch measurement model. SPSS program was used in the general evaluation. For the analyses carried out using Rasch measurement model, 20 raters (students) evaluated the instructional process of 6 teaching staff. A questionnaire consisting of 16 items was used as the evaluation criteria. As the findings on the general evaluation of teaching staff indicate, the teaching staff performed at usually level for the frequency of the tasks they are expected to fulfil according to the evaluations of students. As for the evaluations carried out through Rasch model, it was observed that teaching staff 4 exhibited the highest performance while teaching staff 3 performed the lowest one. When the raters were listed from the most lenient to the most stringent one, E2 and E20 were the most lenient ones whereas E14 was the most stringent. It was also observed that among the items used as criteria in the process of evaluation by the raters, aim and scope was the hardest to realize on the side of the teaching staff while fair evaluation, neutral towards students and teaching were comparatively easier to fulfil.
dc.identifier.endpage290
dc.identifier.issn0738-7989
dc.identifier.issue5-6
dc.identifier.startpage277
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/22877
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000637098100006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInt Council Materials Education
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Materials Education
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectTeaching Staffquality
dc.subjectCivil Engineering
dc.subjectRasch Measurement Model
dc.titleEVALUATION OF TEACHING STAFF TO INCREASE THE QUALITY OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION THROUGH MANY FACET RASCH MEASUREMENT MODEL
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0c7fa87a-41bf-4f14-aa8b-f3b388a1abc7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication559d57c6-35f0-44ea-ba3b-a7cf0c5028c7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication514d779e-b53b-47d7-a8d8-5e07c2799629
relation.isAuthorOfPublication92b67604-9bac-42fc-9299-9007aec4a0a4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5eee1e3f-4042-43cb-96bb-2189aca9f962
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0c7fa87a-41bf-4f14-aa8b-f3b388a1abc7

Dosyalar