Comparison of strengthening methods to improve punching behavior of two-way RC flat slabs

dc.contributor.authorMercimek, Omer
dc.contributor.authorGhoroubi, Rahim
dc.contributor.authorErbaş, Yaşar
dc.contributor.authorAnil, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorErbaş, Yaşar
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T09:58:37Z
dc.date.created2022
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractWithin the scope of this study, three different strengthening methods have been proposed to increase the punching strength of reinforced concrete (RC) flat slabs. These methods are a shear stud, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), and textile-reinforced mortar (TRM). Ten large-scale RC flat slabs were produced to investi-gate the effectiveness of strengthening methods. One of these was chosen as a reference, one strengthened with shear stud, four strengthened with FRP and the rest with TRM. Reinforcement type (shear stud, FRP, and TRM), strip direction (straight and diagonal), and anchor usage were determined as experimental variables. The ulti-mate load capacity, initial stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity values were calculated and compared using the load-displacement graphs obtained as a result of the tests of specimens. According to the experimental results obtained, TRM, FRP, and shear stud methods increased the ultimate load capacity by an average of 58%, 52%, and 20%, respectively. These increased values for energy dissipation capacity are 118%, 63%, and 47%, respectively. In the numerical part of the study, the experimental study was simulated with the ABAQUS/Explicit FEM program, and the obtained results were compared with the experimental results. Moreover, the stresses and damage distributions in the specimens were evaluated. As a result of the study, it was seen that the method applied using textile reinforced strips gave the most successful results among three different strengthening techniques applied to improve the behavior of RC slabs under the effect of punching loading.
dc.description.sponsorshipSCIENTIFIC AND TECHNO-LOGICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF TURKEY (TUBITAK) [119 M985]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNO-LOGICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF TURKEY (TUBITAK) , and the project number is 119 M985. The authors would like to thank TUBITAK for their support.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.018
dc.identifier.endpage1516
dc.identifier.issn2352-0124
dc.identifier.orcidErbas, Yasar/0000-0002-3475-9678;
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141813993
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1495
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/19778
dc.identifier.volume46
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000899447700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofStructures
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectTwo Way Rc Slab
dc.subjectStrengthening
dc.subjectPunching
dc.subjectAbaqus
dc.titleComparison of strengthening methods to improve punching behavior of two-way RC flat slabs
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication63ffb47f-2aac-44cd-850c-eb2305f7c20e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery63ffb47f-2aac-44cd-850c-eb2305f7c20e

Dosyalar