Generative Artificial Intelligence Acceptance Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

dc.contributor.authorKaraoğlan Yılmaz, Fatma Gizem
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorKaraoğlan Yılmaz, Fatma Gizem
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-18T10:07:11Z
dc.date.created2023
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentFakülteler, Fen Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Teknolojisi ve Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to formulate an acceptance scale grounded in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The scale is designed to scrutinize students' acceptance of generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications. This tool assesses students' acceptance levels toward generative AI applications. The scale development study was conducted in three phases, encompassing 627 university students from various faculties who have utilized generative AI tools such as ChatGPT during the 2022-2023 academic year. To evaluate the face and content validity of the scale, input was sought from professionals with expertise in the field. The initial sample group (n = 338) underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to explore the underlying factors, while the subsequent sample group (n = 250) underwent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the verification of factor structure. Later, it was seen that four factors comprising 20 items accounted for 78.349% of total variance due to EFA. CFA results confirmed that structure of the scale, featuring 20 items and four factors (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, and social influence), was compatible with the obtained data. Reliability analysis yielded Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.97, and the test-retest method demonstrated a reliability coefficient of 0.95. To evaluate the discriminative power of the items, a comparative analysis was conducted between the lower 27% and upper 27% of participants, with subsequent calculation of corrected item-total correlations. The results demonstrate that the generative AI acceptance scale exhibits robust validity and reliability, thus affirming its effectiveness as a robust measurement instrument.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10447318.2023.2288730
dc.identifier.endpage8715
dc.identifier.issn1044-7318
dc.identifier.issn1532-7590
dc.identifier.issue24
dc.identifier.orcidYilmaz, Ramazan/0000-0002-2041-1750
dc.identifier.orcidKaraoğlan Yılmaz, Fatma Gizem/0000-0003-4963-8083;
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179676727
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage8703
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2288730
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11772/21444
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001123440600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzWoS_20251016
dc.subjectGenerative Artificial Intelligent
dc.subjectChatgpt
dc.subjectStudents
dc.subjectTechnology Acceptance
dc.subjectUtaut Model
dc.titleGenerative Artificial Intelligence Acceptance Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf8345729-c306-40fa-9207-9bef745b9621
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcb421821-8997-4fbd-9234-f1d547288629
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf8345729-c306-40fa-9207-9bef745b9621

Dosyalar