dc.contributor.author | Barak, Belma | |
dc.contributor.author | Avcı, Görkem | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-21T07:34:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-21T07:34:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Barak, B., Avcı, G. (2022). Comparative analysis of Turkey and Germany (Bavaria) secondary education curricula in terms of education for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 13(2), 108-132 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11772/16171 | |
dc.description.abstract | Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) is a teaching and learning approach that
is based on the principles that underpin sustainability and applies to all levels of education.
However, there is a scarcity of research on the integration of curricula with ESD. In this
study, secondary school curricula in Germany (Bavaria) (geography, nature and technology)
and secondary school curricula in Turkey (social studies, sciences) were compared
in terms of learning outcomes and learning areas to the principles of sustainable development
(social-environmental-economic). Attempts have been made to shed light on how
ESD is reflected in the curricula of Turkey and Germany, as well as how the approach
of ESD directs the education curricula. According to the findings of the study, the learning
outcomes and learning areas of the curricula of Turkey and Germany are related to the
principles of sustainable development, and learning outcomes related to SD dimensions
are given more place in the upper grades. Turkeyís social studies curriculum is more
related to SDís social dimension principles; the science curriculum is more related to
SDís environmental dimension principles; and Germanyís geography, nature and technology
curricula are more related to SDís environmental dimension principles. The number
of learning outcomes related to the economic dimension principles of SD in both countriesí
curricula has been determined to be very low. Especially in Germanyís curricula,
unlike Turkeyís curricula, it has been determined that students offer solutions to existing
environmental-social-economic problems for sustainability in the context of problemsolving
skills and learning outcomes that include case study activities are included. | tr_TR |
dc.language.iso | eng | tr_TR |
dc.publisher | Sciendo | tr_TR |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.2478/dcse-2022-0022 | tr_TR |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Education for sustainable development | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Comparative education | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Turkey and Germany curricula | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Sustainable development | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Dimensions of sustainable development | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Türkiye müfredatı | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Almanya müfredatı | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Sürdürülebilir kalkınma | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın boyutları | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Sürdürülebilir kalkınma için eğitim | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Karşılaştırmalı eğitim | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Turkey curricula | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Germany curricula | tr_TR |
dc.title | Comparative analysis of Turkey and Germany (Bavaria) secondary education curricula in terms of education for sustainable development | tr_TR |
dc.type | article | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Bartın Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Temel Eğitim Bölümü | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.authorID | 0000-0002-4489-1613 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 108 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 132 | tr_TR |